To me that 2nd one looks like a scan of a photo that has deteriorated. So it didn't appeal to me.
This is a discussion on Landscapes from the archives within the Show your photo (Color) - Landscape & Nature (flowers, mountains, storms etc.) forums, part of the Photography & Fine art photography category; To me that 2nd one looks like a scan of a photo that has deteriorated. So it didn't appeal to ...
To me that 2nd one looks like a scan of a photo that has deteriorated. So it didn't appeal to me.
Ahhh right ok...thanks
Maybe that's why it does appeal to me. I tend to like the deterioration and film like colours.
Poor photos follow no rules, ok photos follow some rules, great photos break some rules, classic photos break all the rules........there are no rules!
Technical perfection is only ever important if it improves the asthetic. It is not the precursor to beauty. Not in art..not in music and not in photography!
Well if it's any consolation I'd have nominated that 1st shot if Marko didn't beat me to it
Poor photos follow no rules, ok photos follow some rules, great photos break some rules, classic photos break all the rules........there are no rules!
Technical perfection is only ever important if it improves the asthetic. It is not the precursor to beauty. Not in art..not in music and not in photography!
Bookmarks