Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12

Scarred & Weathered

This is a discussion on Scarred & Weathered within the Show your photo (Color) - Landscape & Nature (flowers, mountains, storms etc.) forums, part of the Photography & Fine art photography category; Thoughts? They're both under 250KB, but still blurry See on Flickr instead: 1 2...

  1. #1
    Gem
    Gem is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    839
    My Photos
    Please do NOT edit my photos

    Default Scarred & Weathered

    Thoughts?
    They're both under 250KB, but still blurry
    See on Flickr instead: 1 2
    Attached Images Attached Images  

     

    Nikon D90 - Stephen
    Nikkor 55-200mm VR
    Nikkor 28mm 2.8 AF-D
    SB-600 Speedlite

  2. #2
    Iguanasan's Avatar
    Iguanasan is offline Moderator
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Halifax, NS
    Posts
    10,917
    My Photos
    Please feel free to edit my photos
    Critiques
    Critique my photos anywhere in the forum

    Default

    Hmmm... don't know. Marko?

    As for the images, I love the textures.. nice
    “If you are out there shooting, things will happen for you. If you’re not out there, you’ll only hear about it.” – Jay Maisel
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Feel free to edit my shots ONLY for use on this forum and critique my shots in ANY discussion area.
    Flickr | Blog | Google+

  3. #3
    asnow is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    mississauga, on
    Posts
    4,977
    My Photos
    Please feel free to edit my photos
    Critiques
    Critique my photos anywhere in the forum

    Default

    Love the textures in these. It does appear that the Flicker version has more detail.

  4. #4
    Mad Aussie's Avatar
    Mad Aussie is offline Moderator
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Brisbane, Qld, Australia
    Posts
    14,098
    My Photos
    Please ask before editing my photos

    Default

    The system does seem to compress the images when uploaded here at ph.ca. I find just using the flickr url for your images works best for me. Ph.ca was actually compressing that as well after the latest upgrade but Marko and I found that issue and he was able to correct it.

  5. #5
    Marko's Avatar
    Marko is offline Administrator
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Montreal, QC. Canada
    Posts
    14,870
    My Photos
    Please do NOT edit my photos
    Critiques
    Critique my photos anywhere in the forum

    Default

    Hmm this is odd, and the files are NOT the same. The flickr photo is 332x500 and 183k

    The photo here is 319x480 and 180k

    now let's upload the flickr photo (I was able to download it from flickr to my local machine and upload it as normal) one more time as a test.

    So I am stumped - MY upload is IDENTICAL to your flickr upload in all respects.
    So I must ask, How exactly did you upload this photo?

    thx! Marko
    Attached Images Attached Images  

    - Please connect with me further
    Photo tours of Montreal - Private photography courses
    - Join the new Photography.ca Facebook page
    - Follow me on Twitter http://twitter.com/markokulik
    - Follow me on Google+ https://plus.google.com/u/0/111159185852360398018/posts
    - Check out the photography podcast


    "You have to milk the cow quite a lot, and get plenty of milk to get a little cheese." Henri Cartier-Bresson from The Decisive Moment.

  6. #6
    Redneck is offline Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Anywhere Outdoors In Ontario
    Posts
    80
    My Photos
    Please do NOT edit my photos

    Default

    Very interesting shot Gem. Cool tree scar with lots of texture shown.

  7. #7
    Gem
    Gem is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    839
    My Photos
    Please do NOT edit my photos

    Default

    Thanks for the comments, guys!

    Marko, I exported those photos via Picasa like Iguanason suggested in an other thread (and the last photo I had done it for had turned out fine). I tried exporting at 800 pixels, but when I uploaded as an attachment, it was slightly blurry as well. I thought maybe it was because it was still over the 200-some KB limit, so I downsized it more, but it still didn't help.

    The last time I tried uploading from flickr by downloading the image, it had STILL turned out blurry =/
    Nikon D90 - Stephen
    Nikkor 55-200mm VR
    Nikkor 28mm 2.8 AF-D
    SB-600 Speedlite

  8. #8
    Iguanasan's Avatar
    Iguanasan is offline Moderator
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Halifax, NS
    Posts
    10,917
    My Photos
    Please feel free to edit my photos
    Critiques
    Critique my photos anywhere in the forum

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gem View Post
    Thanks for the comments, guys!

    Marko, I exported those photos via Picasa like Iguanason suggested in an other thread (and the last photo I had done it for had turned out fine). I tried exporting at 800 pixels, but when I uploaded as an attachment, it was slightly blurry as well. I thought maybe it was because it was still over the 200-some KB limit, so I downsized it more, but it still didn't help.

    The last time I tried uploading from flickr by downloading the image, it had STILL turned out blurry =/
    When you export from Picasa what did you specify for the "Image Quality" dropdown? (Automatic, Normal, Maximum, Minimum, Custom?)
    “If you are out there shooting, things will happen for you. If you’re not out there, you’ll only hear about it.” – Jay Maisel
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Feel free to edit my shots ONLY for use on this forum and critique my shots in ANY discussion area.
    Flickr | Blog | Google+

  9. #9
    Gem
    Gem is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    839
    My Photos
    Please do NOT edit my photos

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Iguanasan View Post
    When you export from Picasa what did you specify for the "Image Quality" dropdown? (Automatic, Normal, Maximum, Minimum, Custom?)
    It was set to Automatic (default).
    Nikon D90 - Stephen
    Nikkor 55-200mm VR
    Nikkor 28mm 2.8 AF-D
    SB-600 Speedlite

  10. #10
    Iguanasan's Avatar
    Iguanasan is offline Moderator
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Halifax, NS
    Posts
    10,917
    My Photos
    Please feel free to edit my photos
    Critiques
    Critique my photos anywhere in the forum

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gem View Post
    It was set to Automatic (default).
    Hmmm... Automatic means it should export with the original detail (ie. no compression). I'd try it again and see maybe if something strange happened when you tried it the first time... or did you try that already?
    “If you are out there shooting, things will happen for you. If you’re not out there, you’ll only hear about it.” – Jay Maisel
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Feel free to edit my shots ONLY for use on this forum and critique my shots in ANY discussion area.
    Flickr | Blog | Google+

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36