LinkBack URL
About LinkBacksShot 1 does have a bluish colour cast to my eye, but it still seems more striking in colour than the second shot. Maybe somewhere in between? The second shot is losing some of that colour punch imo.
This is a discussion on Vista within the Show your photo (Color) - Landscape & Nature (flowers, mountains, storms etc.) forums, part of the Photography & Fine art photography category; Shot 1 does have a bluish colour cast to my eye, but it still seems more striking in colour than ...
Administrator
Shot 1 does have a bluish colour cast to my eye, but it still seems more striking in colour than the second shot. Maybe somewhere in between? The second shot is losing some of that colour punch imo.
- Please connect with me further
Photo tours of Montreal - Private photography courses
- Join the new Photography.ca Facebook page
- Follow me on Twitter http://twitter.com/markokulik
- Follow me on Google+ https://plus.google.com/u/0/111159185852360398018/posts
- Check out the photography podcast
"You have to milk the cow quite a lot, and get plenty of milk to get a little cheese." Henri Cartier-Bresson from The Decisive Moment.
Moderator
I see a very slight blue cast to the first shot but to me it looks perfectly right. There would be a blue cast on the mountains from that distance in this light I think.
The 2nd shot has a strong yellow cast.
Just noting also ... I changed a monitor yesterday and recalibrated both.
Senior Member
Definitely tend to agree that first version has much more pleasing colour to it. Was just commenting on the man-made presence in the corner that stood out on such a beautiful natural scene.
Also agree would look better just PS'd out rather than cropped, as the foreground really works in this shot.
Guess I shoulda' just kept quiet eh Casil? (sorry,)
Reality is a nice place to visit, but I wouldn't want to live there!
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks