Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13

Ideal focal for portraits

This is a discussion on Ideal focal for portraits within the General photography forums, part of the Photography & Fine art photography category; Hi everyone, I always thought that the best focal length for portraits was about 80-100mm, that it was the most ...

  1. #1
    benoitc23 is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Montreal
    Posts
    6

    Default Ideal focal for portraits

    Hi everyone,

    I always thought that the best focal length for portraits was about 80-100mm, that it was the most flattering for your subjects.
    That over 100mm, everything was too compressed in the photo and it lost it's impact.
    Too wide, your subject looked distorted.

    Lately, i'm hearing that alot of pros use those long lenses (200-400mm) for portraits.
    And that wide angle lens are increasingly used for portraits, and i've seen some really good pictures done between 24-36mm.

    I don't know what's best to use anymore!
    It's like, really, any focal is good as long as you use it well in it's limitations?!

    What focal do you personaly prefer for portraits?
    Anyone knows some tips for portraits in wide-angle that are not distorted?
    Last edited by benoitc23; 07-26-2008 at 10:44 AM.

  2. #2
    Marko's Avatar
    Marko is offline Administrator
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Montreal, QC. Canada
    Posts
    14,870
    My Photos
    Please do NOT edit my photos
    Critiques
    Critique my photos anywhere in the forum

    Default

    I'm not sure about what's 'best' anymore given crop factors with DSLR cameras. I can say that I my 70-200 mm for portraits and I'm often working at the 110-200mm end. I see no reason why interesting portraits cannot be taken with a 200-400mm. The main con might be the fact that those lenses (especially the good ones) are big to lug around and expensive and need faster shutter speeds when hand-held....making them often more suitable for images that need a tripod (which is not the best for casual portraits. The BEST focal length will always be personal.

    I've taken many portraits with wide angles. As you get closer to the subject the image distorts. Back off just a bit and the distortion is WAY less noticeable.

    Hope that helps!
    Marko

    Quote Originally Posted by benoitc23 View Post
    Hi everyone,

    I always thought that the best focal length for portraits was about 80-100mm, that it was the most flattering for your subjects.
    That over 100mm, everything was too compressed in the photo and it lost it's impact.
    Too wide, your subject looked distorted.

    Lately, i'm hearing that alot of pros use those long lenses (200-400mm) for portraits.
    And that wide angle lens are increasingly used for portraits, and i've seen some really good pictures done between 24-36mm.

    I don't know what's best to use anymore!
    It's like, really, any focal is good as long as you use it well in it's limitations?!

    What focal do you personaly prefer for portraits?
    Anyone knows some tips for portraits in wide-angle that are not distorted?
    - Please connect with me further
    Photo tours of Montreal - Private photography courses
    - Join the new Photography.ca Facebook page
    - Follow me on Twitter http://twitter.com/markokulik
    - Follow me on Google+ https://plus.google.com/u/0/111159185852360398018/posts
    - Check out the photography podcast


    "You have to milk the cow quite a lot, and get plenty of milk to get a little cheese." Henri Cartier-Bresson from The Decisive Moment.

  3. #3
    baddness is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Nova Scotia
    Posts
    142

    Default

    I was told that 50mm or an 85mm are good for portraits. I have the 75-300 but I use that for sports and haven't tried it for portraits.

  4. #4
    tirediron is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    1,201

    Default

    I've had some good results using my 60mm (90mm equiv) for portrait work, and the venerable 50mm 1.4 is hard to beat as well. A lot depends on how much room you have. If I actually did any serious portrait work, this little toy would be a must: http://www.popphoto.com/cameralenses...dc-nikkor.html

  5. #5
    baddness is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Nova Scotia
    Posts
    142

    Default

    ack that a nikon lens

  6. #6
    benoitc23 is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Montreal
    Posts
    6

    Default

    Thanks all for your input!
    I rarely do portraits, but for now I think I will stick mainly to my 50mm prime (100mm equivalent on my E-410) since it's my best lens.
    I might experiment with wide-angle when I don't want to blur the background.. do more a story-telling kind of portrait.

    Happy shooting!

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    83

    Default experiment

    Quote Originally Posted by benoitc23 View Post
    Thanks all for your input!
    I rarely do portraits, but for now I think I will stick mainly to my 50mm prime (100mm equivalent on my E-410) since it's my best lens.
    I might experiment with wide-angle when I don't want to blur the background.. do more a story-telling kind of portrait.

    Happy shooting!
    Experimentation is often the way to go - you know your equipment and what it does - most people discover different settings by pushing the boudaries here and there. Sometimes the effects are pretty good - sometime horrid - you wont know unless you try it out.

  8. #8
    tegan is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    948

    Default

    The general thinking of the pros is that 80mm is far enough away to avoid distortion caused by camera angles and yet close enough to imply interaction and a visual relationship with the photographer/viewer. The camera is also not too close to invade the "personal" space of the model so the resulting comfort level supposedly produces better results as well.

    Personal style is also involved too. Some photographers like to shoot from a "detached" distance using a longer lens, whereas others like to shoot up close and personal.

    Tegan
    "Photographic art requires the technical aspects of photography and the design aspects of art, both at an outstanding level."

  9. #9
    Richard Annable is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Melbourne Australia
    Posts
    7

    Default

    With the possible expections of the extremes focal ranges (fisheye and super telephoto) don't discount any lens as a portrait lens as each will provide you a different look and feel.

    My favourite two are the 85 1.8 and the 70-200 2.8. In theory these are either side of the 100mm standard.
    Wedding Portrait & Event Photographer
    www.rxaphotography.com

  10. #10
    tegan is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    948

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Richard Annable View Post
    With the possible expections of the extremes focal ranges (fisheye and super telephoto) don't discount any lens as a portrait lens as each will provide you a different look and feel.

    My favourite two are the 85 1.8 and the 70-200 2.8. In theory these are either side of the 100mm standard.

    Well the 85mm 1.8 is an excellent portrait lens and I have used a 200mm 2.8 prime for memorable 8 by 10 portraits of children, so I would say that my experience supports your views.

    Tegan
    "Photographic art requires the technical aspects of photography and the design aspects of art, both at an outstanding level."

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36