Results 1 to 7 of 7

Anyone using the Sigma 10-20mm?

This is a discussion on Anyone using the Sigma 10-20mm? within the General photography forums, part of the Photography & Fine art photography category; Are the wide open distortions really obvious?...

  1. #1
    Travis is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Huntsville Muskoka
    Posts
    678

    Default Anyone using the Sigma 10-20mm?

    Are the wide open distortions really obvious?
    ______________________

    Nikon D300, Nikkor 24-70 2.8 . Nikkor 70-200 2.8 . Nikkor 50mm 1.8 . Sigma 105mm 2.8 . Tokina 12-24 4 . SB-600 . 2xVivitar 285

  2. #2
    Marko's Avatar
    Marko is offline Administrator
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Montreal, QC. Canada
    Posts
    14,870
    My Photos
    Please do NOT edit my photos
    Critiques
    Critique my photos anywhere in the forum

    Default

    I actually have this lens and I quite like it.
    But YES the distortion is definitely noticeable wide open at different focal lengths.
    - Please connect with me further
    Photo tours of Montreal - Private photography courses
    - Join the new Photography.ca Facebook page
    - Follow me on Twitter http://twitter.com/markokulik
    - Follow me on Google+ https://plus.google.com/u/0/111159185852360398018/posts
    - Check out the photography podcast


    "You have to milk the cow quite a lot, and get plenty of milk to get a little cheese." Henri Cartier-Bresson from The Decisive Moment.

  3. #3
    tegan is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    948

    Default

    So, I hope you are correcting the distortion in postprocessing!

    Tegan

  4. #4
    Travis is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Huntsville Muskoka
    Posts
    678

    Default

    That was gonna be my next question....

    I'm looking now to pick up a wide lens for architecture and perspective landscapes.... Post processing is the least interesting aspect in photography (too me)... so I was hoping the distortion for this lens to be nominal... or desirable... I have been reading that the distortion for this lens is hard to correct... but this is the trade off for 10mm focal..(unless you shoot canon)..

    I have also seen internet blitherings that claim there are a lot of "soft" copies of this lens. I'm a purchasing at a local store that might have 2 or 3 of them... any suggestions how to cherry pick and what to look for?? I wouldn't be able to bring them home... but I would be able to take a shot with each one in or outside the store... will the onboard monitor have good enough resolution to discern any difference?

    I am also considering the Tokina 12-24... and a new highly rated Tokina 11-16 that is out this June.... BUT.. the Sigmas have the internal focus motor(hSM) and the Tokina's don't.... This mean manual focusing every shot... Does this really matter with wide lens??? Aren't most shots at infinity??
    ______________________

    Nikon D300, Nikkor 24-70 2.8 . Nikkor 70-200 2.8 . Nikkor 50mm 1.8 . Sigma 105mm 2.8 . Tokina 12-24 4 . SB-600 . 2xVivitar 285

  5. #5
    tegan is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    948

    Default

    The only lenses that solve the distortion problem are the tilt/shift lenses.
    Software-wise, DXO Optics Pro has plug-ins to match particular cameras and lenses including the Sigma 10mm to 20mm and Nikons. Easy to use in that the processing button automatically does corrections for the particular camera and lens. Consider trying out a demo to see if it works for you, and is the type of thing you want.

    Tegan

  6. #6
    Marko's Avatar
    Marko is offline Administrator
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Montreal, QC. Canada
    Posts
    14,870
    My Photos
    Please do NOT edit my photos
    Critiques
    Critique my photos anywhere in the forum

    Default

    This mean manual focusing every shot... Does this really matter with wide lens??? Aren't most shots at infinity??
    Manual focus is not an issue for me but it is for some people..although many wide angled shots are shot at infinity for some applications, it is not at all a rule of thumb. So you will DEFINITELY be manually focusing this lens at focal lengths less than infinity. If this is an issue for you, I'd nix the lens.

    thx

    Marko
    - Please connect with me further
    Photo tours of Montreal - Private photography courses
    - Join the new Photography.ca Facebook page
    - Follow me on Twitter http://twitter.com/markokulik
    - Follow me on Google+ https://plus.google.com/u/0/111159185852360398018/posts
    - Check out the photography podcast


    "You have to milk the cow quite a lot, and get plenty of milk to get a little cheese." Henri Cartier-Bresson from The Decisive Moment.

  7. #7
    Travis is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Huntsville Muskoka
    Posts
    678

    Default

    ya... i'm not afraid to manual focus... i have a rangefinder that confirms when i'm in focus so no biggy...

    especially since most subjects in the 10-20 range will be static... i'll have all the time in the world...
    ______________________

    Nikon D300, Nikkor 24-70 2.8 . Nikkor 70-200 2.8 . Nikkor 50mm 1.8 . Sigma 105mm 2.8 . Tokina 12-24 4 . SB-600 . 2xVivitar 285

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36