Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 35

Good starter Digital SLR?

This is a discussion on Good starter Digital SLR? within the General photography forums, part of the Photography & Fine art photography category; I think that's a nice budget and you'll have no problem finding a very good camera. Tegan is right, normally ...

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Marko's Avatar
    Marko is offline Administrator
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Montreal, QC. Canada
    Posts
    14,870
    My Photos
    Please do NOT edit my photos
    Critiques
    Critique my photos anywhere in the forum

    Default

    I think that's a nice budget and you'll have no problem finding a very good camera. Tegan is right, normally the lens that comes with the camera is, well, crappy.

    If you already have lenses for a particular camera, then you probably want to see if those lenses will work on the camera that you buy and buy that brand. If you are starting from scratch I would see if I could get a Canon 20D or Canon 30D used. I can vouch for the 30D since I own it and the 20D is very similar.

    The Nikon D-40 has also gotten good reviews and would be a good camera to start with to get the feel of an SLR. What I would AVOID doing is spending too much money to get bells and whistles at this point.

    Hope that helps!

    Marko

  2. #2
    Megan is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    3

    Default

    Thanks, that does help. If I buy a Canon, what would be a good lens to start with?

  3. #3
    arbie is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Megan
    Thanks, that does help. If I buy a Canon, what would be a good lens to start with?
    A good starter lens to go with either the 20D or 30D is the EF-S 17-85 f/4-5.6 IS. It's got a big zoom range and image stabilization, so it's great for all situations. The image quality is reasonable for the price: at $600 it won't break the bank.

    When you get around to looking at prices, I suggest checking out http://www.photoprice.ca. It's a very useful price comparison website for Canadians.

  4. #4
    Marko's Avatar
    Marko is offline Administrator
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Montreal, QC. Canada
    Posts
    14,870
    My Photos
    Please do NOT edit my photos
    Critiques
    Critique my photos anywhere in the forum

    Default

    Hey that's an interesting price comparison site arbie, Thanks!

    The lens I started with is the Tamron AF 28-75MM F/2.8 XR Di LD Aspherical (IF)

    It's a wicked good lens that I believe cost me about 400 dollars US. I still use it often.

    Hope that helps!

    Marko

  5. #5
    Lovin's Avatar
    Lovin is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    North Vancouver, Canada
    Posts
    915
    My Photos
    Please ask before editing my photos
    Critiques
    Critique my photos anywhere in the forum

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by marko
    The Nikon D-40 has also gotten good reviews and would be a good camera to start with to get the feel of an SLR.
    So Nikon D40 is still a good one?

    Is it true, that Nikon cameras come with good lens comparing with Canon, that you have to buy, because what comes with the body are crappy ?
    One of my friends told me that, for Nikon you don't have to buy new ones, only if you need also different lens(depends on each person what they need - but in generally Nikon lens that comes with the body are ok).
    I was thinking that for me, Nikon D40 is good and I can't find it at a good price.
    D80 is too science fiction for me now

  6. #6
    tegan is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    948

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lovin
    So Nikon D40 is still a good one?

    Is it true, that Nikon cameras come with good lens comparing with Canon, that you have to buy, because what comes with the body are crappy ?
    Yes according to the mags that test such things, Canon provides the worst quality kit lenses with the camera, despite the fact that they make excellent high quality lenses. Nikon, Sony and the others provide better quality kit lenses.

    So, if you are buying Canon, buy body only, and then choose the lens you want rather than taking the one that comes with the camera.

    Tegan

  7. #7
    Lovin's Avatar
    Lovin is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    North Vancouver, Canada
    Posts
    915
    My Photos
    Please ask before editing my photos
    Critiques
    Critique my photos anywhere in the forum

    Default

    I'll go for Nikon D40.

  8. #8
    tegan is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    948

    Default

    Well, Marko and I take different points of view. He says: Don't buy more than what you need at the present time and upgrade later if you need to. (That is paraphrasing.) He is not necessarily wrong. It is more a matter of approach. He saves money by not buying features he may not use.

    I tend to go with: Buy more than what you need, so that you will not have to upgrade so quickly. I save money by not upgrading quite as fast.

    Most consumer DSLRs are at the 10 megapixel level and will be at 12 megapixels and higher before the end of the year. Impossible to keep up, but nevertheless I would not recommend that anyone purchase a DSLR at under 10 megapixels.

    Just my view.

    Tegan
    Last edited by tegan; 02-17-2008 at 09:42 PM.

  9. #9
    Lovin's Avatar
    Lovin is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    North Vancouver, Canada
    Posts
    915
    My Photos
    Please ask before editing my photos
    Critiques
    Critique my photos anywhere in the forum

    Default

    Both of you are right.
    Now, Nikon D40 is not a nexpensive one, and also not a professional one.
    There is a D40 with 10 megapixels, and is not so expensive. For me expensive goes from $1000-1200 and up.
    Now I have to check if D40 have auto-focus, not that I want to rely on autofocus, but for start it will help me.
    Anyway I want a Nikon.

    Thanks for the advice Tegan.

  10. #10
    tegan is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    948

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lovin
    Both of you are right.
    Now, Nikon D40 is not a nexpensive one, and also not a professional one.
    There is a D40 with 10 megapixels, and is not so expensive. For me expensive goes from $1000-1200 and up.
    Now I have to check if D40 have auto-focus, not that I want to rely on autofocus, but for start it will help me.
    Anyway I want a Nikon.

    Thanks for the advice Tegan.
    All digital cameras have autofocus but in low lighting conditions it is often necessary to focus manually.

    Tegan

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36