12x18 from Adoramapix
This is a discussion on My first two prints for my exhibit within the General photography forums, part of the Photography & Fine art photography category; 12x18 from Adoramapix...
12x18 from Adoramapix
"The worst thing about taking a great image is that your next one has to be better!"
What did you have these printed on, AT? I was also wondering if you got ICC profiles from them to soft prof in Lightroom before sending them off to the labs. Inquiring minds want to know.
"The worst thing about taking a great image is that your next one has to be better!"
O.K., I got'cha. Same difference almost. Basically, in house color correction means they did the soft proofing for you. Likely as not, most of their work is done that way. It would't surprise if their techs have printed enough to be able to look at a file and tell if there are any out of gamut colors or any other possible problems and just leave it the heck alone if there isn't. Glad you're happy with them. That's all that counts.
Did they specify a color space before the upload?
Not sure what you are talking about again. Are you talking about the white boarder? I select that because I don't want the matte cutting into the image (especially the runner, with the lamp so high).Did they specify a color space before the upload?
"The worst thing about taking a great image is that your next one has to be better!"
You did the right thing there, I think. Sometimes you'll loose a little around the edges when you use a lab. If they don't tell you that up front, it can be a bummer. When I ask about color space I was talking about something else, though.
Marko did a podcast on it, and it was one of the best you'll find out there.
Life was simple. You would take a picture and download it. Possibly do a little editing. Then you decided to print. You learned about colour profiles and colour spaces. All innocence is suddenly lost and you have discovered the many pitfalls of the printed photograph.
Color Space and Color Profiles | dpBestflow
Adobe RGB. But I also use sRGB because to me the colours look better on the web without much adjustment. A little thing i learned recently when editing in Lightroom -if you scroll down to camera calibrations or in Bridge click on the little camera on the top and you will see your camera's particular profiles that you can use when shooting in jpegs. If you shoot raw, in ADOBE Standard, when you open your photo in Bridge or LR, you will probably find it rather dull and lacklustre compared to what you saw on the back of your camera. If you choose one of the profiles (and it depends on what camera you use what choices you see such as camera neutral, camera vivid or camera portrait which are Nikon choices.) You will get an instant boost. It is easier to edit a photo that already looks better so this little step just gives you a nicer starting place. Sorry a bit off topic.
Yeah, me too. I'm shooting RAW+ JPEG Fine (just because I can, by God). As far as the RAW file goes it matters not what you choose, but I ask myself why I would purposely want to strip away any available colors from the JPEG. It may be counter-productive 'cause I shoot with the Standard Pic Control. Capture NX2 lets me select another (Vivid,Portrait, Landscape, etc.) if Standard isn't cutting it. Man, it can get confusing. You here so many different things from so many different people.
I was asking AT about this 'cause I feel like the more the lab ask of the author, the more they have his best interest in mind. Maybe another misconception on my part, but...
Help, Marko. I'm drowning.
Bookmarks