Given the lens you have already, if the Canon 17-85 IS gets great reviews it's the one I would choose. That way you carry two totally different lenses with the least overlap and have a large focal range covered. Jmo though.
This is a discussion on Lenses - canon, sigma, tamron within the Digital photography forums, part of the Photography & Fine art photography category; Given the lens you have already, if the Canon 17-85 IS gets great reviews it's the one I would choose. ...
Given the lens you have already, if the Canon 17-85 IS gets great reviews it's the one I would choose. That way you carry two totally different lenses with the least overlap and have a large focal range covered. Jmo though.
- Please connect with me further
Photo tours of Montreal - Private photography courses
- Join the new Photography.ca Facebook page
- Follow me on Twitter http://twitter.com/markokulik
- Follow me on Google+ https://plus.google.com/u/0/111159185852360398018/posts
- Check out the photography podcast
"You have to milk the cow quite a lot, and get plenty of milk to get a little cheese." Henri Cartier-Bresson from The Decisive Moment.
Thank you Antz and Marko,
for now it will be 17-85 IS and I will start saving for a better lenses. :( :(
backing up the Tamron here, my 17-50 which i got for 375 mint with the hoya thrown in is wicked sharp. As long as you dont need fast auto focus and dont mind a plastic lens (still sturdy though) id say Tamron.
Have you looked at sigma's 17-70 2.8-4.0 OS HSM, great lens for the money.
please don't hold back on the C&C, otherwise how can i learn.
Jayde
Bookmarks