Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 15 of 15

Which lens graces your camera..

This is a discussion on Which lens graces your camera.. within the Digital photography forums, part of the Photography & Fine art photography category; I have the Nikkor 18mm-135mm f3.5-5.6G and the 50mm 1.4D I have lots of hockey and animal life I would ...

  1. #11
    kat
    kat is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Vancouver
    Posts
    4,329
    My Photos
    Please ask before editing my photos
    Critiques
    Only critique photos posted in the critique forum

    Default

    I have the Nikkor 18mm-135mm f3.5-5.6G and the 50mm 1.4D

    I have lots of hockey and animal life I would like to start shooting so looking at another lens to better suit that. Any suggestions..would love to hear them!

    Acutally, next purchase will be a flash and Lightroom 2.

  2. #12
    dmagick is offline Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    60

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kat View Post
    I have the Nikkor 18mm-135mm f3.5-5.6G and the 50mm 1.4D

    I have lots of hockey and animal life I would like to start shooting so looking at another lens to better suit that. Any suggestions..would love to hear them!

    Acutally, next purchase will be a flash and Lightroom 2.
    I don't know anything about nikon lenses so can't recommend anything specific, but for animals/sports, I'd probably suggest a longer zoom (200mm or more) to be able to fill the frame with the subject.

  3. #13
    mindforge is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Visalia, CA
    Posts
    330

    Default

    If you want to shoot hockey at a distance, you'll need something fast no matter what. Probably @200 to 400mm. I would get a prime just because of the price at that level. You can get really fast primes - problem: you will miss some shots because you will have to move your body and not the zoom.

    You can probably shoot animal life with the same lens. I shoot sports and animals from a tripod no matter what. Sometimes I have to drop a tripod for sports and go with a monopod because of restrictions or space. The monopod matters but I think getting a good ball head is even more important.

    Keep in mind that you will spend upwards of $1500 and easily more on these lenses. Double it for the VR. I think a 300mm 2.8 VR is around $8,000. Now, there are others. You can spend $300 (probably way less) on a Tamron 70-300... but you are trying to get that 2.8 not a 4.5.

    Back to the subject matter. I realized something about my 50mm 1.4 - when I put that on one of my D90's it has never come off. What is so perfect about the lens. The Bokeh pattern is beautiful. I hit 1/2000 shutter speed at 1.4 on a cloudy day in the shade. So yeah, it has never come back off. When I only have one lens to go to, that would be it. But then again, I always shoot people.

  4. #14
    kat
    kat is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Vancouver
    Posts
    4,329
    My Photos
    Please ask before editing my photos
    Critiques
    Only critique photos posted in the critique forum

    Default

    Thank you Mindforge! I knew with this lens that I am going to be putting in some money..so we'll get other things first and make sure I get exactly what I want!!!!

  5. #15
    tirediron is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    1,201

    Default

    My 'go to' lens is the Nikkor 24-70 2.8.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36