For Tired Iron and Travis, the Singh Ray circular polarizer exposure loss is 1/2 an F stop.
Tegan
This is a discussion on Filters within the Digital photography forums, part of the Photography & Fine art photography category; For Tired Iron and Travis, the Singh Ray circular polarizer exposure loss is 1/2 an F stop. Tegan...
For Tired Iron and Travis, the Singh Ray circular polarizer exposure loss is 1/2 an F stop.
Tegan
"Photographic art requires the technical aspects of photography and the design aspects of art, both at an outstanding level."
Well... from looking at their website.. they only seem to have two polarizers.....
their "warming" polarizer is spec'd 1.33 fstop
http://www.singh-ray.com/polarizers.html
their "gold and blue" polarizer is spec'd 2.5 fstop
http://www.singh-ray.com/goldnblue.html
______________________
Nikon D300, Nikkor 24-70 2.8 . Nikkor 70-200 2.8 . Nikkor 50mm 1.8 . Sigma 105mm 2.8 . Tokina 12-24 4 . SB-600 . 2xVivitar 285
Hi guys,
I've read this thread, and despite having already purchased my filters, what are the Cokin filter classed as? That is, are they the cheap ones people are talking about here... If so, i'm hoping my resulting photos are not going to be impacted drastically!
Thanks,
Dan.
Hi all,
I am planning to buy CPL mainly to use it to shoot car races in the middle of the day (with strong african sun). I have tried to take several pictures and they always are over exposed or underexposed when I try to play around. Even if I got a good exposure it will be only part of the car. Especially when the car is white it gives me alot of problems. For this reason I am planning to buy CPL. Will that work? Earlier on the thread I think I read the sun should be horizontal to the camera. If I am not mistaken. And in my case it will almost all the time will be around 10am-1 pm that I need to shoot.Any advice?
Thanks
The horizontal thing is to avoid reflection which is something else a polarizer does. In your case you are using it to reduce contrast so forget about that.
It will work so long as you ALSO understand basic exposure. A white car against a bright sky - a dark skinned man against a very dark wall are all scenarios that will fool your camera with or without a filter. Hope that helps
Marko
- Please connect with me further
Photo tours of Montreal - Private photography courses
- Join the new Photography.ca Facebook page
- Follow me on Twitter http://twitter.com/markokulik
- Follow me on Google+ https://plus.google.com/u/0/111159185852360398018/posts
- Check out the photography podcast
"You have to milk the cow quite a lot, and get plenty of milk to get a little cheese." Henri Cartier-Bresson from The Decisive Moment.
Thanks Marko,
Will gray card help in this situations? Or anyother methods? I meter in the camera is totally fooled as you said. The other problem is that all cars are not white and the same metering sometimes works for different colored cars.
I am struggling to get it.
In a nutshell - any scene with a variety of tones and not too bright is normal.
In a nutshell - any scene with mainly dark of tones is abnormal - and you'll likely need to reduce exposure.
In a nutshell - any scene with a mainly light tones abnormal - and you'll likely have to increase your exposure. So when you shoot a sky that fills most of the frame - the camera meter says " hey sooo bright let me reduce exposure to make the reading normal". so everything else in the scene is underexposed. the remedy is to increase the exposure.
You should be able to SEE this (the results if they are good or bad) though in your viewfinder after you take the shot.
To practise - choose a spot under a shady tree or something with normal brightness range (Ie NOT in a bright shaft of light)
- shoot a white sheet that fills the frame - see the results
- shoot a dark sheet or something really dark that fills the frame - see the results
- shoot something with mixed tones - see the results.
THAT's how you learn exposure.
You need to forget about the tools for a sec...and understand what the camera does with basic scenes exposure wise and then more complex scenes exposure wise.
THEN - deal with the tools.
A greycard is amazing but impractical in many situations. Sure put it in a scene while you are practicing..
The magic is not in the tools - it comes from understanding how the camera will render a scene. It takes practice but getting too hung up on the 'tools' takes away from the general understanding of what is going on.
In terms of the racecars - if they are going around fast, you have no time to fiddle with exposure. So...if the lighting stays the same..(.a big cloud overhead) you can shoot manually based on a normal taken without the cars. But if the light keeps changing you're better off on aperture or shutter priority.
How 'off' are your exposures anyway?
Maybe you should start a new thread and post some results - might be easier to figure out
Hope that helps..
Marko
Last edited by Marko; 12-04-2008 at 10:56 AM.
- Please connect with me further
Photo tours of Montreal - Private photography courses
- Join the new Photography.ca Facebook page
- Follow me on Twitter http://twitter.com/markokulik
- Follow me on Google+ https://plus.google.com/u/0/111159185852360398018/posts
- Check out the photography podcast
"You have to milk the cow quite a lot, and get plenty of milk to get a little cheese." Henri Cartier-Bresson from The Decisive Moment.
Thanks Marko,
I will go and practice. I will see what the outcome and start a new thread may be. If I don't improve. But Again I am very much grateful to your help.
Bookmarks