This is a discussion on Filters within the Digital photography forums, part of the Photography & Fine art photography category; Originally Posted by tirediron Ret: That filter should do you just fine. MikeS: Yes and no; CPOLs do reduce the ...
I hope that I m able to take a shot that comes close to the one you posted. I think that shot is just beautiful and with your permission can I use that as my laptop's wallpaper
btw, the CPOL that i got is Hoya Super HMC and on Hoya's website they have PRO -1D filters so whats the difference b/w them or are they the same?
S HMC
PRO-1D
Last edited by ret; 09-25-2008 at 12:15 AM.
Oh? All of my experience shows that good ones block almost exactly one stop; my Hoya blocks almost exactly one stop, my B+W blocks almost exactly one stop... some, like the Singh-Ray Blue/Gold warming polarizer actually block slightly more, but AFAIK, it's only the really cheap ones which will block significantly more.
You're more than welcome to use that as your wallpaper. With respect to your question about the filters: The answer is packaging. The "D" and "DMC" designations that Hoya applies to some of their filters is meant to imply that these are filters specifically for digital cameras. A CPOL is a CPOL is a CPOL (Quality issues aside of course) and these filters will produce identical results under identical conditions.
As with lenses, price is an excellent quide to quality, at least among name-brand products. If the price is the same, you can be the characteristics are the same (Or darn close).
thanks for the wallpaper, i mean pic
i talked to Henrys and the rep suggest the pro-1D .... it's a little darker than the S-HMC but has the thread in the front to put on lens cap .... and it's price went down from $199 and now is the same as S-HMC's .... i swapped the S-HMC with Pro-1D
True that and it IS a problem. I hate fiddling with both the UV and polarizer...but I do all the time. Although I use a polarizer often, when I'm not using it, I don't want it on the camera (light loss -colour cast albeit small)...hence the fiddling.Disadvantage with a UV filter is that in combination with a polarizer, it can often cause vignetting with a wide angle lens. As a result, a number of photographers are keeping a polarizer on for almost all shots rather than playing with taking a polarizer or UV filter on and off.
Tegan
- Please connect with me further
Photo tours of Montreal - Private photography courses
- Join the new Photography.ca Facebook page
- Follow me on Twitter http://twitter.com/markokulik
- Follow me on Google+ https://plus.google.com/u/0/111159185852360398018/posts
- Check out the photography podcast
"You have to milk the cow quite a lot, and get plenty of milk to get a little cheese." Henri Cartier-Bresson from The Decisive Moment.
Is it advisable to shoot with the CPOL always on the lens and shoot with it most of the time?
I have found it useful to have on the lens most of the time. Outside it improves landscape shots and handles glare and reflections. Inside it reduces the harse glare of flash. I even used it in a dark situation in a mine to reduce flare from a light toward the other end of the shaft.
Tegan
"Photographic art requires the technical aspects of photography and the design aspects of art, both at an outstanding level."
Bookmarks