Fireworks

[kurtdriver]

That's pretty much what I thought you meant, I'll check the owner's manual for the RB67, being at least 35 years old, maybe it'll take digital film, they did things differently back then.

[tirediron]

That's pretty much what I thought you meant, I'll check the owner's manual for the RB67, being at least 35 years old, maybe it'll take digital film, they did things differently back then.

LOL, what I meant was shoot with the digital first to get a bit of practice, then once you're comfortable with the technique, break out the 6x7.

[Marko]

T.I offers excellent advice here. Nothing beats the instant feedback of digital, so try that before the 6x7 and your success rate will be higher.

[kurtdriver]

T.I offers excellent advice here. Nothing beats the instant feedback of digital, so try that before the 6x7 and your success rate will be higher.

Thanks to each of you. T.I. does give good advice, and I've enjoyed reading his posts in both this and other threads. I was cursing myself last night for not following his advice to get a good spot.
My only digital camera is in a cell phone. It does not make good photos. Perhaps I should have specified that a Canon T90 is a film camera, but I didn't think anyone would assume it to be digital. Thanks again and happy shooting, Kurt

[Greg_Nuspel]

That's pretty much what I thought you meant, I'll check the owner's manual for the RB67, being at least 35 years old, maybe it'll take digital film, they did things differently back then.

I'm sure you could pick up one of those cheap digital backs, you know the 22 mega-pixel with 12 stops of tonal range.

[kurtdriver]

I'm sure you could pick up one of those cheap digital backs, you know the 22 mega-pixel with 12 stops of tonal range.

Alas, 7199 bucks, American, and they fit the RZ67, rather than my RB67, I didn't bother finding out the price on that. Somewhere on the web, I saw one that had 33MP, but I just don't have room for thirty three million pixels. Or is that in base 8?