Results 1 to 9 of 9

Flower in Water

This is a discussion on Flower in Water within the Critiques forums, part of the Photography & Fine art photography category; One of my favorite things to photograph up close & personal....

  1. #1
    kiley9806 is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    AB Canada
    Posts
    731
    My Photos
    Please do NOT edit my photos

    Default Flower in Water

    One of my favorite things to photograph up close & personal.
    Attached Images Attached Images  


  2. #2
    Marko's Avatar
    Marko is offline Administrator
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Montreal, QC. Canada
    Posts
    14,870
    My Photos
    Please do NOT edit my photos
    Critiques
    Critique my photos anywhere in the forum

    Default

    I thing this is a good attempt. I'd like to see the whiter petals a bit darker though. I also like to see flowers busing with colour and the pink seems a bit washed out. Was it this colour in 'reality'? The focal point is the yellow middle of the flower but it is almost dead center in the photograph. It would be stronger if it were placed on one of the 'thirds'. Maybe a higher angle looking into the flower would also have been cool.

    Hope that helps,

    marko
    - Please connect with me further
    Photo tours of Montreal - Private photography courses
    - Join the new Photography.ca Facebook page
    - Follow me on Twitter http://twitter.com/markokulik
    - Follow me on Google+ https://plus.google.com/u/0/111159185852360398018/posts
    - Check out the photography podcast


    "You have to milk the cow quite a lot, and get plenty of milk to get a little cheese." Henri Cartier-Bresson from The Decisive Moment.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    83

    Default

    Perhaps on your next attempt you could be better focused on the pollen; also, with shots like these it's important to make sue that the water doesn't end up too plastic-y looking

  4. #4
    AcadieLibre's Avatar
    AcadieLibre is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
    Posts
    2,151
    My Photos
    Please do NOT edit my photos
    Critiques
    Only critique photos posted in the critique forum

    Default

    Well I hate to disagree, I think it works very well and has an almost surreal look to it. The outer softness makes your eye draw to the centre. I am sure printed and framed that would look fabulous, I would suggest a black metal (satin finish) frame and a off white matting. Just an idea . I have never had a good thing to say about a flower photo before, mostly dislike them, but just have to say I like this one, it actually stands out and different from the everyday flower photo. Very well done.
    “I take photographs with love, so I try to make them art objects. But I make them for myself first and foremost - that is important.” Jacques-Henri Lartigue

    "All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke

    "Vive L'Acadie, Liberté, égalité, fraternité, ou la mort!"




  5. #5
    kiley9806 is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    AB Canada
    Posts
    731
    My Photos
    Please do NOT edit my photos

    Default

    thanks for all the comments - good & bad. i doubt i'll get the chance to take this shot again, it was taken in a botanical garden in thailand. the color is the same as it was in reality, i just upped the saturation a tiny bit, and sharpened it a touch. otherwise, its untouched. i agree the whiter parts of the petals would look better pinker, but then again, id probably look better blond then bruntette, and thats just not natural... the water is actually one of my fav things, i love how the lily pad parts are shown, and sort of frame the flower/make the background more interesting than just flat water. of course, its just an attempt, and as always theres room for improvement. thanks again for the comments.

  6. #6
    tegan is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    948

    Default

    From a composition standpoint your framing is too tight and a smaller fstop as in f22 would have given you a greater depth of field and sharper focus throughout...that is if you did not slightly move the camera or have too low a shutterspeed.

    Tegan

  7. #7
    Travis is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Huntsville Muskoka
    Posts
    678

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tegan
    From a composition standpoint your framing is too tight and a smaller fstop as in f22 would have given you a greater depth of field and sharper focus throughout...that is if you did not slightly move the camera or have too low a shutterspeed.

    Tegan
    I don't think she has F22 on her cam... I think it's like f2 - f6 or something like that....
    ______________________

    Nikon D300, Nikkor 24-70 2.8 . Nikkor 70-200 2.8 . Nikkor 50mm 1.8 . Sigma 105mm 2.8 . Tokina 12-24 4 . SB-600 . 2xVivitar 285

  8. #8
    tegan is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    948

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Travis
    I don't think she has F22 on her cam... I think it's like f2 - f6 or something like that....
    OK, that would be a definite limitation on depth of field.

    Tegan

  9. #9
    kiley9806 is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    AB Canada
    Posts
    731
    My Photos
    Please do NOT edit my photos

    Default

    yup - remember that im shooting with just my dinky sony h5...
    and i like close crops on flowers, for my own reasons, but i agree another shot with more water background would also have looked good.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36