Yes, that looks right in my eye to MA.
As MA mentioned the 2 stop is just a guide. I've had to switch mine up many times to get the right looking combination.
This is a discussion on HDR advice within the Critiques forums, part of the Photography & Fine art photography category; Yes, that looks right in my eye to MA. As MA mentioned the 2 stop is just a guide. I've ...
Yes, that looks right in my eye to MA.
As MA mentioned the 2 stop is just a guide. I've had to switch mine up many times to get the right looking combination.
My new blog as of Nov/10
http://katchickloski.wordpress.com/
Really I dont see why you think they are terrible, for me it is just perfect HDR, you have information in the darken areas of the rock and high areas in the sky, so what is the problem?
Feel free to make comments on any of my shots
my blog: http://bambesblog.blogspot.com/
My flickr photostream: http://www.flickr.com/photos/bambe1964/
A painter takes their vision and makes it a reality. A photographer takes reality and makes it their vision.
for myself, i find shooting at +/- 2 stops is usually too much. +/- 1 stop, or maybe 1.5. should be sufficient, especially for the beach scene you were taking. if you want, you can auto-bracket 3 shots, but i find it's often better to shoot in manual mode, using the exposure guide in the viewfinder to take 4 or 5 shots spanning a +/- 2 stop range. it seems that way the software doesn't have to work quite so hard and the exposures come out more realistic. for the beach scene you were shooting, did you try simply using a grad ND filter? might have eliminated the need for HDR in the first place...
~ Rocky
Any camera will record what you see, but you have to see!
http://www.northwestnaturalimagery.com
Bookmarks