................
This is a discussion on Moon shot help within the Critiques forums, part of the Photography & Fine art photography category; ...................
................
Last edited by tegan; 04-01-2008 at 11:37 AM.
Well here is a very quick, non HDR job of a moon shot with a foreground.
The moon was shot with an equivalent 35mm format of 135mm which looks realistic in size.
Tegan
I too have seen plenty of bad HDRs - but I have seen some amazing HDRs as well.
In terms of whether it would work with the moon shot, I was thinking about that yesterday evening before I read tegan's 'no it would not work' post. I too was thinking that maybe the range is too great. Maybe.
But tegan's sweeping statement (especially since he doesn't do HDR), for me is a challenge...and so I will try it. He may be right but I'm not convinced he's right. And if it does work there will be more detail throughout the photo.
More details and an HDR podcast to follow...
Thx
Marko
- Please connect with me further
Photo tours of Montreal - Private photography courses
- Join the new Photography.ca Facebook page
- Follow me on Twitter http://twitter.com/markokulik
- Follow me on Google+ https://plus.google.com/u/0/111159185852360398018/posts
- Check out the photography podcast
"You have to milk the cow quite a lot, and get plenty of milk to get a little cheese." Henri Cartier-Bresson from The Decisive Moment.
My sweeping statements are somewhat "tongue firmly planted in cheek" so I am glad you did take up the challenge. The range however is so great that you are really only doing my collage approach in a slightly different manner. There is no real tonal benefit to the HDR approach for this type of shot, so why take that approach?Originally Posted by marko
Tegan
Last edited by tegan; 04-01-2008 at 08:35 PM.
I totally agree with everything you have said.Originally Posted by Michaelaw
Tegan
So, Marko, when can I expect to see your HDR moon shot experiment?
I provided my quick rendition.
Tegan
Bookmarks