Did this one up tonight with Gimp. Is there anything about the PP work that stands out?
This is a discussion on Bad Processing? Can you tell? within the Critiques forums, part of the Photography & Fine art photography category; Did this one up tonight with Gimp. Is there anything about the PP work that stands out?...
Did this one up tonight with Gimp. Is there anything about the PP work that stands out?
Nothing looks out of place for me. No sharpness/focus issues that don't look due to aperture choice. No noise either.
Cool flower.
Me on Flickr http://www.flickr.com/photos/mtb_antz
Agree on the sharpness but the PP looks good to my eye!
- Please connect with me further
Photo tours of Montreal - Private photography courses
- Join the new Photography.ca Facebook page
- Follow me on Twitter http://twitter.com/markokulik
- Follow me on Google+ https://plus.google.com/u/0/111159185852360398018/posts
- Check out the photography podcast
"You have to milk the cow quite a lot, and get plenty of milk to get a little cheese." Henri Cartier-Bresson from The Decisive Moment.
yup, I agree with above (like I would argue with these guys ).
but now I'm curious: what was the 'before' image like?
Feel free to make comments on any of my shots
my blog: http://bambesblog.blogspot.com/
My flickr photostream: http://www.flickr.com/photos/bambe1964/
A painter takes their vision and makes it a reality. A photographer takes reality and makes it their vision.
I'll post the original tonight. I used GIMP to darken up the large leaf to the right and was wondering if the edges were visible. Also, I lassoed (is that a word) around the centre of the flower and used the unsharp mask on it to try and sharpen it up. Original to follow...
Filter? What filter?
Bookmarks