I think the first one is okay. What do you all think? Any rooms for improvement?
This is a discussion on Another from the bird park within the Critiques forums, part of the Photography & Fine art photography category; I think the first one is okay. What do you all think? Any rooms for improvement?...
I think the first one is okay. What do you all think? Any rooms for improvement?
I like the environmental shot of the top photo... Since the little guy is part of a bigger picture, he needs to be tack sharp and maybe a bit of boost to his coloring so that he really pops in his environment. The bottom photo is nice too.
The top little guy is sooooooooo cute! The bottom guy is soooooooo cool!!!
Thanks so much tomorrowstreasures.
Agree with TT - 1st shot is really cute but isn't sharp enough.
The second shot (gotta be honest) just doesn't do it for me. It's too centered and the angle is not that interesting IMO.
- Please connect with me further
Photo tours of Montreal - Private photography courses
- Join the new Photography.ca Facebook page
- Follow me on Twitter http://twitter.com/markokulik
- Follow me on Google+ https://plus.google.com/u/0/111159185852360398018/posts
- Check out the photography podcast
"You have to milk the cow quite a lot, and get plenty of milk to get a little cheese." Henri Cartier-Bresson from The Decisive Moment.
Yeah, the first shot is not sharp enough and I feel the same of the second one. I have some more shots of the second and will try to process one of them.
For the first one, I don't know why it is not sharp enough.
The EXIF is 300mm (70-300mm sigma),
f8,
1/500,
ISO 400.
Shouldn't it be sharper with this exif? I am having problems with sharpness and I don't know why.I try to use higher that the focal length rule for the shutter speed but still face sharpness issues. any advice.
When I want very sharp pictures, I use a SOLID tripod and a remote control. If I don't have the remote control (I use the Nikon ML-3 ) with me , then I'll settle for a delayed shutter so as to eliminate possible camera shake. Of course, in all case I'll do a very precise manual focus on the subject.
Last edited by zenon5940; 09-27-2009 at 11:06 AM.
It could be a repair problem as Greg mentioned...BUT it could also be that you are not holding the camera steady enough and should be using a tripod with this lens for birding shots.
1/focal length of the lens is not law, it's only a guide for minimum shutterspeed.
For longer lenses I have found that this guide DOES NOT always hold true. In this case, maybe 1/500 was not enough handheld.
You'll want to do some simple tests if this continues. Try 1/500 with a tripod and without. See if you can see a difference. If I had to bet, you will see a difference. Hope that helps - Marko
- Please connect with me further
Photo tours of Montreal - Private photography courses
- Join the new Photography.ca Facebook page
- Follow me on Twitter http://twitter.com/markokulik
- Follow me on Google+ https://plus.google.com/u/0/111159185852360398018/posts
- Check out the photography podcast
"You have to milk the cow quite a lot, and get plenty of milk to get a little cheese." Henri Cartier-Bresson from The Decisive Moment.
Thank you all. I will expriment this weekend and share the result with you in case there is any interest.
Interesting birds, I have never seen em before. I think you have the right exposition and focus, but I think you may want to work the composition a bit more.
Bookmarks