I just was wondering if the pink in the background was too distracting? IMO, not too much, but then again it always helps to have an impartial eye!
Shot 2 is a landscape version without the pink.....
Thanks....
This is a discussion on Wildflowers within the Critiques forums, part of the Photography & Fine art photography category; I just was wondering if the pink in the background was too distracting? IMO, not too much, but then again ...
I just was wondering if the pink in the background was too distracting? IMO, not too much, but then again it always helps to have an impartial eye!
Shot 2 is a landscape version without the pink.....
Thanks....
"Life is like photography, we develop from the negatives"-anonymous
My website: www.albertaandbeyond.com
Those are some erect flowers
I prefer shot 2.
For me the hot pink in shot 1 is a distraction, then again, maybe it's trying to woo the flowers I'll stop know.
- Please connect with me further
Photo tours of Montreal - Private photography courses
- Join the new Photography.ca Facebook page
- Follow me on Twitter http://twitter.com/markokulik
- Follow me on Google+ https://plus.google.com/u/0/111159185852360398018/posts
- Check out the photography podcast
"You have to milk the cow quite a lot, and get plenty of milk to get a little cheese." Henri Cartier-Bresson from The Decisive Moment.
"Life is like photography, we develop from the negatives"-anonymous
My website: www.albertaandbeyond.com
Ts, ts, ts - typical men's comments .
I see the pink colour and it seems a bit distracting to me.
I liked the first flower, tho I would prefer if the background were like a third underexposed
Bookmarks