If given the choice, I like the image without the tree.
I'm not sure i would have cloned it out had i shot it with the tree, but seeing these 2 side by side, the image without the tree looks more balanced to my eye. Hope that helps - Marko
This is a discussion on River in Fog within the Critiques forums, part of the Photography & Fine art photography category; If given the choice, I like the image without the tree. I'm not sure i would have cloned it out ...
If given the choice, I like the image without the tree.
I'm not sure i would have cloned it out had i shot it with the tree, but seeing these 2 side by side, the image without the tree looks more balanced to my eye. Hope that helps - Marko
- Please connect with me further
Photo tours of Montreal - Private photography courses
- Join the new Photography.ca Facebook page
- Follow me on Twitter http://twitter.com/markokulik
- Follow me on Google+ https://plus.google.com/u/0/111159185852360398018/posts
- Check out the photography podcast
"You have to milk the cow quite a lot, and get plenty of milk to get a little cheese." Henri Cartier-Bresson from The Decisive Moment.
I'd say keep the tree ... add contrast ... get the fog more white and it'd be a very cool shot.
Thanks everyone for the input.
Interesting exersize - cutting out the tree....never occured to me, but I like the tree having looked at them side by side. I agree the fog needs to be whiter, when I turned this into a jpeg for posting I didn't really pay attention to it and the cast became a little too yellow from ths split toning I had applied in PS.
As far as the contrast goes, ya, hmm.... I like the low contrast, the fog was REALLY thick and actually the contrast was boosted a fair bit already. I think if the contrast was boosted any more it would look too processed and fake - but if anyone else has a shot in the fog that has high contrast I would love to see it.
Anyway thanks!!
Matthew
www.3rdmp.com
This is fantasic. i love it
Bookmarks