I just downloaded a trail version of Photomatrix and put some images to the test....these are the stream shots I found last weekend.
I'm not sure if they are any good but this is a way fun process regardless!
This is a discussion on Playing with HDR within the Critiques forums, part of the Photography & Fine art photography category; I just downloaded a trail version of Photomatrix and put some images to the test....these are the stream shots I ...
I just downloaded a trail version of Photomatrix and put some images to the test....these are the stream shots I found last weekend.
I'm not sure if they are any good but this is a way fun process regardless!
"Life is like photography, we develop from the negatives"-anonymous
My website: www.albertaandbeyond.com
They looked way better on my computer than on this post.........especially the first one.
"Life is like photography, we develop from the negatives"-anonymous
My website: www.albertaandbeyond.com
Nice. Where were these taken? I'm guessing they were not bracketed exposures?
I didn't bracket them...is that why they look weird? I did use a tripod however.
The little wishing well on Highway 40 is where they were taken.
Ahhh well...I guess I know what I'm doing for my next trip out to the mountains!
"Life is like photography, we develop from the negatives"-anonymous
My website: www.albertaandbeyond.com
No i think they're way better than my first attempt at HDR, and that was using a b racketed sequence. That said, I was using Photoshop merge to do it and I later learned there were some steps I skipped. From what I've heard Photomatrix is da bomb! In the morning I'll be getting out my map to find hwy 40!
You'll find if you upload to a flickr or photobucket album or similar and link here the photos come out a bit sharper. This forum seems to reduce the quality ever so slightly and we see as a bit softer image than it should be.
I like the color and tone on the second. Yes, the attachments fuction seems to make images appear unsharp and weird at times.
Last edited by casil403; 03-25-2009 at 11:03 AM.
"Life is like photography, we develop from the negatives"-anonymous
My website: www.albertaandbeyond.com
I have to look into this issue...but in general, if the photo is less than 150K to start, in my experience (100% of of images I have uploaded) the shots look decent when uploaded directly.
What was the Original filesize of image 1 casil?
thx
Marko
- Please connect with me further
Photo tours of Montreal - Private photography courses
- Join the new Photography.ca Facebook page
- Follow me on Twitter http://twitter.com/markokulik
- Follow me on Google+ https://plus.google.com/u/0/111159185852360398018/posts
- Check out the photography podcast
"You have to milk the cow quite a lot, and get plenty of milk to get a little cheese." Henri Cartier-Bresson from The Decisive Moment.
The original was 5.2 MB Marko
"Life is like photography, we develop from the negatives"-anonymous
My website: www.albertaandbeyond.com
Bookmarks