logo critique

[AngieDee]

unsure if this is the right place to ask this, but I'm considering a "logo" or "watermark" or whatever you want to call it, to add to my photos. Just thought I'd get some opinion? I created this myself and wondering if there's someone with some experience that could shed any light on this matter. Thank you!

Note: I have just exported it from Photoshop so it gave it a white background; when using it as it is right now, there is no background, just text.

[theantiquetiger]

Its a nice watermark, but you misspelled "photography".....

Just kidding, but I made you go back and look!!!

As for watermarks, I don't see the need for them unless you are planning on becoming a professional or printed artist. There are some members here that use watermarks, but they are professional artist. If you are going to use a watermark, keep it simple (this one is nice), and make it small enough so it will not distract the viewer.

[Michaelaw]

That didn't surprise me AT....Americans spell all kinds of stuff funny As for the logo, it's way better than mine because at least it exists