Results 1 to 6 of 6

Trippy Guitar

This is a discussion on Trippy Guitar within the Critiques forums, part of the Photography & Fine art photography category; this shot is 2 images edited with gimp, Both pictures were shot using iso auto and no flash shot 1 ...

  1. #1
    merman is offline Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Guelph
    Posts
    66

    Default Trippy Guitar

    this shot is 2 images edited with gimp, Both pictures were shot using iso auto and no flash
    shot 1 - f11 1/25
    shot 2 - f11 1/60

    i did not use a tripod for either, the bur was somthing i was going for, i changed postions for each shot, but stayed in the same general area (ie my right foot stayed planted)

    the subject is a good friend of mine so i want to make this picture as appealing as i can so CRITIQUE! lol
    thanks
    --scotty
    Attached Images Attached Images  


  2. #2
    Travis is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Huntsville Muskoka
    Posts
    678

    Default

    I don't know what to say Merman..... I'm just not into this shot....

    The effect of the double exposure looks more like it was shot through a glass reflection. The colours are too funky. Face is covered up. It's soft.

    This is all IMO of course. If you like it than sing it proud.
    ______________________

    Nikon D300, Nikkor 24-70 2.8 . Nikkor 70-200 2.8 . Nikkor 50mm 1.8 . Sigma 105mm 2.8 . Tokina 12-24 4 . SB-600 . 2xVivitar 285

  3. #3
    Mad Aussie's Avatar
    Mad Aussie is offline Moderator
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Brisbane, Qld, Australia
    Posts
    14,098
    My Photos
    Please ask before editing my photos

    Default

    I'll have to agree with Travis I think on this one, but then I'm not a great one to ask about photos that no longer look photographic but more graphic. I'm very select on this.

    Having said that though I love the creativity and understand what you are trying to do here.

    For me, I'd want to see some more in focus areas .... amp perhaps ... hat ... something. And the colours would have to be less transparent.

    I'm wondering if the look you are going for could be achieved with a 2nd Sync flash and about a half or full sec exposure?

  4. #4
    Marko's Avatar
    Marko is offline Administrator
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Montreal, QC. Canada
    Posts
    14,870
    My Photos
    Please do NOT edit my photos
    Critiques
    Critique my photos anywhere in the forum

    Default

    I agree with Mad Aussie and Travis here. Perhaps if were able to see his face it would add another element...but as it is now it's not the most effective shot imo.
    - Please connect with me further
    Photo tours of Montreal - Private photography courses
    - Join the new Photography.ca Facebook page
    - Follow me on Twitter http://twitter.com/markokulik
    - Follow me on Google+ https://plus.google.com/u/0/111159185852360398018/posts
    - Check out the photography podcast


    "You have to milk the cow quite a lot, and get plenty of milk to get a little cheese." Henri Cartier-Bresson from The Decisive Moment.

  5. #5
    merman is offline Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Guelph
    Posts
    66

    Default

    his face can be hard to get (especially during face melting solos lol), but i can see were more focus could be a plus, next time i will definetly try the second/slow sync, and play around a bit as well, i just hope i can get that smoke effect again.

    the pic is not too graphical, this is what i did;
    overlayed shot 1 over shot 2
    selected a grain merge on shot 1
    tweaked the saturation a little
    cropped

    i will admit the shot was affected by the few beverages i had that night,
    dont drink and shoot!

    thanks for the honesty everyone!

  6. #6
    scorpio_e's Avatar
    scorpio_e is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Easton Pa
    Posts
    524
    My Photos
    Please do NOT edit my photos
    Critiques
    Only critique photos posted in the critique forum

    Default

    I think the element in the upper left is distracting. It is very creative... I like the concept and I would go after it again A few less element in the background to simplify things
    www.steelcityphotography.com

    My mistake has been seeking new landscapes. I should have been seeking new light.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36