I think at this point, you need to establish the definition of PRO. Personally, I would be more than willing to take a Pentax K7, with most any of their DA* lenses(200mm, 300mm, or their 400mm) and put them against Canon or Nikon. They may not be considered "Pro" level products, but I can almost promise, that if you were to compare the images side by side on our monitors we would not notice much of a difference. For that reason, I would have no problem taking a K7 or two with a couple nice prime lenses and standing right next to some of the more expensive Canons and Nikons commonly used for "Pro" events. You may catch some funny looks, but I didnt think we cared about that.
This is why Ive chosen Pentax, because the level of quality they bring to the table is much more appealing than that of a similar quality of Nikon or Canon. To be quite honest, I believe that Pentax is much more flexible than any Nikon or Canon out today due to the availability of their older lenses as well.
To me, photography is about learning and adventure. I do this because I like it. I have no real need for a specific function. I can understand why you would buy a Canon or Nikon for certain needs, but really there isnt anything Pentax doesnt, or hasnt already offered.
Bookmarks