I completely agree. But some people cannot afford a good tripod, let alone spend several hundred dollars on one but still need something sturdy. My camera is worth less than $500. Oh yeah, it is insured for everything except for water damage, there is another reason I am a little more risky too.
I really want to drop $800+ on a tripod but I can't, I am still trying to get some lighting stuff and all that. Getting a horrible flash can fry your camera too.
I am not in disagreement at all with you. I think if you have an expensive camera you need to have a good tripod, but if you are operating with an entry level DSLR I think that having a tripod that is more expensive than your camera just doesn't make any sense. But, when I do upgrade to a better camera body, trust me I will be upgrading to a better tripod. It's kind of like getting applicable insurance. I wouldn't pay $1000 to protect $500. But I would pay that much to protect a more expensive camera and to take better pictures.
Again, I completely agree but this inexpensive Hakuba tripod works really well for what I need it for but I would never set it up in the wind. I am pretty much standing right next to my camera when I use my tripod... but you are right... "It only takes one gust of wind to topple this thing and a fall from six feet would probably destroy my camera."
Bookmarks