I downloaded a free version of Photomatix (note the watermarks). Granted this is a faux single image HDR, but has anyone here used it. Is it worth the $100
Streetcar by Theantiquetiger, on Flickr
This is a discussion on New Orleans Streetcar - Faux HDR with Photomatix within the Architecture & Man Made (cities, buildings, roads, objects & abstracts) forums, part of the Show your photo (Color) - Landscape & Nature (flowers, mountains, storms etc.) category; I downloaded a free version of Photomatix (note the watermarks). Granted this is a faux single image HDR, but has ...
I downloaded a free version of Photomatix (note the watermarks). Granted this is a faux single image HDR, but has anyone here used it. Is it worth the $100
Streetcar by Theantiquetiger, on Flickr
"The worst thing about taking a great image is that your next one has to be better!"
I have used it a little and I think it is generally seen as the the HDR standard, however I personally prefer HDR Efex Pro 2. I am probably in the minority with this.
For $149 you can get the entire Nik software suite including HDR Efex. Color Efex, Silver Efex, Define. Sharpener & Viveza. I personally think this is better value, but I am sure others will not agree.
Quite a few shots I have posted on the forum have used HDR Efex Pro.
Marko has done couple of good podcasts on HDR including the software that would be worth listening to if you go down this path
Luminence HDR is free and can do a reasonable job, but it is difficult to use IMO.
The 'poppy' result works for me here and i dig the comp.
- Please connect with me further
Photo tours of Montreal - Private photography courses
- Join the new Photography.ca Facebook page
- Follow me on Twitter http://twitter.com/markokulik
- Follow me on Google+ https://plus.google.com/u/0/111159185852360398018/posts
- Check out the photography podcast
"You have to milk the cow quite a lot, and get plenty of milk to get a little cheese." Henri Cartier-Bresson from The Decisive Moment.
Bookmarks