LinkBack URL
About LinkBacksE-520 Oly 70-300 Lense
Shot in Victoria B.C.
This is a discussion on Moon Shot within the Architecture & Man Made (cities, buildings, roads, objects & abstracts) forums, part of the Show your photo (Color) - Landscape & Nature (flowers, mountains, storms etc.) category; E-520 Oly 70-300 Lense Shot in Victoria B.C....
Senior Member
Moon Shot
E-520 Oly 70-300 Lense
Shot in Victoria B.C.
Senior Member
Wow, pretty cool. Care to share the settings you used?
I'm here to learn so comments, critiques and complaints are always welcome!
Southern Scenic Photography
Facebook Photography Page
500px Page
_____________________
Chris
Senior Member
Shutter Priority 1/400, f 5.6, IS0 400 , White Balance AutoOriginally Posted by Lizardqing
A Very clear night also helped.
Senior Member
That is remarkably good for a 'mere' 600mm equivalent lens! Slightly noisy but that is to be expected (this must be close to a 1:1 crop, no?). Personally I've had some luck shooting crescent moons, you get more crater detail as the sun is shining at it from the side and not head on.
Senior Member
Yes it is a 1:1 crop.
IMO This " mere 600mm " is a Good lens . It blows some Competition 300 mm lenses out of the water.
If you look around on the internet and some of my Oly 70-300 shots
It can produce some VERY nice pictures.
Fred..
Senior Member
Great shot !
Yes, Olympus, actually Zuiko lenses, 70-300mm are better than Canon, Nikon or Pentax or any other 70-300mm lens out there.
"I suddenly understood that a photograph could fix eternity in an instant." - Henri Cartier Bresson
Senior Member
well done
" A good photograph is one that communicates a fact, touches the heart and leaves the viewer a changed person for having seen it. " Irving Penn
" There are no rules for good photographs, there are only good photographs." - Ansel Adams
Senior Member
Hmm while I completely agree that Oly make and made some outstanding lenses, in some cases better than most of the competition, the reviews that I've seen of this particular lens are good but not incredibly so. I certainly wouldn't expect it to be significantly better (in IQ terms) than the Nikkor 70-300 or Pentax 55-300. I don't know much about Canon lenses so no opinion there.
Administrator
I really like this!
Just as an FYI, I've heard (but never tried) that moon exposures can be based on the sunny 16 rule. F16 - ISO 100 - 1/100
The exposure of this scene is 3 stops brighter. I like the way this is rendered though!
- Please connect with me further
Photo tours of Montreal - Private photography courses
- Join the new Photography.ca Facebook page
- Follow me on Twitter http://twitter.com/markokulik
- Follow me on Google+ https://plus.google.com/u/0/111159185852360398018/posts
- Check out the photography podcast
"You have to milk the cow quite a lot, and get plenty of milk to get a little cheese." Henri Cartier-Bresson from The Decisive Moment.
Moderator
I have tried. The trick is to realize that the moon is reflected sunlight and therefore should be shot the same as a sunny day as long as you have a nice clear sky then it normally works out just fine. At least it did for me when I tried it once. I always wondered why the moon was overexposed when I used to try and capture it and then I realized why. Now, I shoot much closer to daylight settings and it works out just dandy.
This is a very nice shot, FredS.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks