Photography podcast #74 is all about the hyperfocal distance and how to use it in landscape photography. In a nutshell, hyperfocal distance is the distance you focus at to get greater depth of field when focusing on an object in the distance. In this podcast we define what hyperfocal distance is and how to use it for both traditional (film) photography and in digital photography with new DSLRs and lenses.‚ We also talk about when not to use the hyperfocal distance in landscape photography.
Hyperfocal distance chart from dofmaster.com — used by permission; thanks Don Fleming!‚ This beautiful application from the dofmaster.com site clearly shows that by focusing at the hyperfocal distance you gain over 4 feet of sharpness toward the foreground when you use a 5omm lens at F-16 and focus at 27.1 feet instead of‚ where the object actually is at 50 feet.. Try this test for yourself; shoot 1 shot the regular way and 1 shot using the hyperfocal distance. This application already lists the most common digital cameras and takes their crop factors into account.
Left image shot normally while right image was shot at the hyperfocal distance. Even at this small size you can see that the right shot shows a bit more sharpness in the midground while the background looks similar in both shots. The effects are more noticeable when you print at larger sizes.
Links /resources mentioned in this podcast:
Dofmaster’s awesome depth of field calculator that also calculates hyperfocal distance
Dofmaster’s depth of field calculator for free use with an iphone (need to connect to the Net — use this URL from an IPhone ONLY — NOT from your computer)
Dofmaster’s simulated depth of field calculator for free use with an Non-iphones (need to connect to the Net)
Dofmaster’s Itunes depth of field calculator App for $1.99 (No Internet connection required)
November’s ‘landscapes in portrait orientation’‚assignment on the Photography.ca forum
Please join the Photography.ca fan page on Facebook
My Facebook profile — Feel free to “friend” me — please just mention Photography.ca
My Twitter page — I will follow you if you follow me — Let’s connect — PLEASE email me and tell me who you are in case I don’t reciprocate because I think you are a spammer.
If you are still lurking on our forum,
feel free to join our friendly Photography forum
Thanks to Kat, Glenn Euloth (Iguanasan), Bambi and Alex Maxim who posted a blog comment about our last podcast. Thanks as always to everyone that sent comments by email about our last podcast. Although ALL comments are appreciated, commenting directly in this blog is preferred. Thanks as well to all the new members of the bulletin board.
If you are looking at this material on any other site except Photography.ca — Please hop on over to the Photography.ca blog and podcast and get this and other photography info directly from the source. I Subscribe with iTunes I Subscribe via RSS feed I Subscribe with Google Reader I Subscribe for free to the Photography podcast — Photography.ca and get all the posts/podcasts by Email
You can download this photography podcast directly by clicking the preceding link or listen to it almost immediately with the embedded player below.
Podcast: Play in new window | Download
Thanks for the podcast marko…
I have a question.….. it may sound stupid but i was trying to use this and I could not figure this thing out.
Now that we dont have distance on the barrel of the lens, how do i know the distance where I am focusing at?
Example : The mountain in the picture .… say it is 200 feet from me.. is there a way to know how far the mountain is? Or i guess it? N then when it comes to putting my focus point on the hyperfocal distance; again how do i know i am focusing on that distance. Is there a way to know it in the view finder or on screen????
Thanks for the compliment, and no problem on the question. Most lenses still DO have distance scales in meters and feet. Every lens I own (from old to new) has a distance scale, what’s missing is the hyperfocal distance scale on the newer lenses.
IF by chance you don’t have that distance scale, you’ll need an alternative device that measures distance. You can pick these up in hardware stores. Hope that helps — Marko
Hi Marko –
Very nice podcst; informative, as usual.
I attended a talk by Adam Jones (a Canon Explorer of Light), and in discussing this he said to focus on the farthest object you want in focus, then focus on the nearest object you want in focus, then manually focus halfway between them. It’s simple but does it work? I haven’t had a chance to try it.
A 2nd idea that simplifies matters is to use the live view option (if your camera has it) and look and see if everything you want to be in focus is. Since the scene can be magnified 10x, that’s a pretty reliable and simple approach. Don’t remember where I heard about this.
Hope these tips are good, because I expect to use them. I’m nt keen on consulting a chart when shooting, but will do if that’s the best alternative.
Keep these terrific podcasts coming!
kent wilson
Hi Yisehaq,
Usually there are numbers on the lens barrel to help you gauge the distance. Sometimes though you do have to estimate it as you might have a 10 foot marking and the next marking is 25 feet. It depends on the lens. That estimation will still likely increase your DOF.
For more precision you will need an additional instrument like a tape measure or some electronic device that measures precise distance. Hope that helps — marko
Indeed it’s informative but allow me to ask the dumb question, ?how do you know how to focus on 23.7 ft rather than 40ft ? Am I missing something??
Just thought i would mention that the chart mentioned –http://dofmaster.com/dofjs.html– works on my Blackberry bold. I have to enlarge the screen but it does work.
many thanks bambi, 42 and crystalb!
Very easy to understand, Great podcast! Thanks
Thanks for this podcast Marko. It’s a very difficult topic, but you explaned it very clearly. I’m gonna practice this as soon a I get a chance…
thank you Marko, as a newbie to all this, I found this podcast very helpful.
Hi Dominic and thanks for the comment. Here’s some help that should work for Mac http://dofmaster.com/dofjs.html works from any computer. http://dofmaster.com/doftable.html you should be able to print this for different focal lengths. Hope that helps — Marko
This podcast was sort of a “DUH”, for me, because I had forgotten about this technique.
I went and checked out the website you recommended, but it is PC based. This is all fine and dandy, but what about those of us with a MAC?
I guess we simply have to build our own. Given the calculations, it should be relatively simple.
Thank you for the proverbial smack in the head, I needed it.
If I find a MAC based site I will post it.
Some how submit my prev comment before I was finished.
I wanted to add that thanks to the podcast now I know about these calculators and that the technique has a name.
Great podcast Marko. I’d never hear of the term before, or used any sort of calculator before, but I it is a technique I have applied through common sense. Especially for shallow DOF Macro shots. N
Thanks for the comments Michael Van der Tol raiven and Aaron Hockley. Might be interesting to do a test. Focus 1/3 of the way in, in shot 1 versus using a depth of field calculator in shot 2. Don’t get me wrong…even I have used the focus 1/3 of the way in technique in a pinch, but I cannot recommend it as a ‘method’ as per the answer to JJJ. It’s just so easy to have something portable and 100% precise in your camera bag or on a smartphone. Why gamble when precision is just as easy the majority of the time.
Thanks Marco! With the old lenses it was easy. I was actually going to ask the same question as Jimmy. Darwin Wigget recommended focusing about one third of the way into scene as well at the recent lecture we attended.
Good stuff!
Great podcast as usual. I especially want to commend you for doing a great job in the audio description… this is a very visual topic, and the fact that you could make it clear in an audio format is a credit to your ability to teach. Thanks!
Great podcast Marko — as usual. I learned something new — See, you can teach “mature” photographers new tricks
It’s a pleasure JJJ!
One thing though, your comment about Rick Sammon’s technique may be misleading to newbies reading this.
Focusing on “a point” approx. 1/3 into the scene is only good to think about in theory. There’s very little precision with a technique like that.
ALSO the exact place you will focus will VARY based on the focal length of the lens, the aperture you choose for that lens and how far you are away from the object. Focusing 1/3 of the way in therefore is at best an estimation, a decent one in many cases, but not precise. For precision, use a depth of field calculator. Hope that helps — Marko
Hey Marko.I found your podcast on hyperfocal distance very informative. I seem to recall a famous or infamous photographer named Rick Sammon advising photographers to focus at a point approx. 1/3 rd into the scene for the greatest depth of field. Now I know why. Thanks again for all the great podcasts. I can hardly wait for the next issue — jimmy
My Pleasure Jack & Benny! Thanks for the link Greg!
Very interesting topic Marko, I knew it existed but never got o look into it. I may try shooting using the rule someday. thanks for explaining it.
Oh that is so interesting and I have to try this at some point. Thank-you for putting these podcasts out.
You can get a calculator for a pocket PC here http://www.dl-c.com/PPC/index.html