I am looking for opinions here. I can't decide which I like better... The edits have subtle differences and then the obvious one of the Sepia.
Printable View
I am looking for opinions here. I can't decide which I like better... The edits have subtle differences and then the obvious one of the Sepia.
I prefer the first one...the shadows on the face in the second one take away from the photo (IMHO). I prefer the detail in the sepia pic.
Either way, they are both great shots!
Thanks for the feedback, Greg!
________________________
Doh! :wall-an: Do any of you do this too? You plop a photo on the internet THEN notice a major fauz pas? Argh! No need to comment on the "hot spot" on the color version. I see it now. Le sigh. :headslap:
Actually I like second one even if is black too much black.Without any details not looks realistic.It can not be repaired any more to give a little light on second eye.First one have more lighten face but around hairs are traces of dodge tool I think.May I show you how I like to see colors on second image? I really like model and how is taken image.
If the contrast wasn't quite so harsh in the 2nd shot, and we could see more of her shadowed side I'd go for that one without hesitation. Besides, her funbags look better in that one. :)
Nice MA! lol.
I prefer shot 1 because the face looks awesome without the shadows, and is clearly the focal point, and her funbags still look good but grab less attention. lol.
Go!
I don't like the halo around her hair in shot 1 and the face looks a bit plastic to me also. Agreed, the bike rack does look good still. ;)
I think that we can both agree....that if we were single she would be suitable for dating. (sorry everyone - lol)
Dunno ... maybe once ... she looks a bit high maintenance to me :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Marko
'funbags'???
'bikerack'????
:rolleyes: seriously guys. they are called 'breasts'.
I like the dreamy feel of the second one but I agree it's a bit too contrasty.