How important is the title of an image? Is it a crutch for a bad image or a bonus for a good one?
Example: The following image on it's own...
Or now with a title:
Missing the Action
Comments?
This is a discussion on A rose by any other name... within the General photography forums, part of the Photography & Fine art photography category; How important is the title of an image? Is it a crutch for a bad image or a bonus for ...
How important is the title of an image? Is it a crutch for a bad image or a bonus for a good one?
Example: The following image on it's own...
Or now with a title:
Missing the Action
Comments?
I vote 'bonus for a good image'
I quite like this one but the title helps us to see what you saw. The funny part is, who's missing the action- the woman for not seeing what the photographer sees or the photographer for not seeing the girl?
![]()
Feel free to make comments on any of my shots
my blog: http://bambesblog.blogspot.com/
My flickr photostream: http://www.flickr.com/photos/bambe1964/
A painter takes their vision and makes it a reality. A photographer takes reality and makes it their vision.
I think a title can be both depending on the image.
In this case I think it helps <insert what Bambi said here>
It's a cool image.
Is this yours Iggy?
Any other opinions?
Bookmarks