1 Attachment(s)
Maybe some confusion or no?
Hi everyone thanks for the input. I think there may be confusion because the pictures uploaded in a different sequence then I intended. Also, I wasn't very clear as to settings. So in the order they appear in this thread, the first living room picture is:
"Sample 2 Is the cameras auto setting with flash f/3.5 1/60 iso 200 0.0exp comp
You can see the window issue is fixed, but I don't like what the flash does to the walls. The flash reflection off the dog and the leather furniture is also undesirable to me."
And the second picture of the living room in this thread is:
Sample 1 shows an attempt with no flash. F3.8 1/40 iso800 +2ev exp comp. This is just a grab shot but I am pleased with the general lighting level. My questions are:
1. The overexposure from the window is an obvious deal breaker. What should I doing to balance the darker inside with sunny outside?
2. Where should my focal point be on a picture of this style? The compression of this picture has revealed a bit of blur that is not so apparent on the true copy. Is this lack of focal point or the higher iso setting?"
The second living room shot is mine per say. I used the camera's "P" function and dialed in the +2ev exp, the 800iso, and messed a little with the white balance. The camera controlled the aperture/shutter in response to the
adjustments. I had to crank up the exposure and iso in order to achieve my flashless shot. The blazing window is the only thing that bothers me because I find it distracting.
Marko - I only shoot in "auto" to give me a rough reference of how my pictures are stacking up against "the machine". I wouldn't have bought a slr just to keep it in auto. However, I am still too green to shoot in "M" unless I'm shooting a study subject where I spend a couple of hours playing around taking 100 pictures of the same thing. Mixing Aperture, Shutter Speed, Exposure, ISO, White balance, and Flash Compensation is too much for me in my second week. So I'm just trying to take control bit by bit. Starting with ISO, Exposure, and White Balance. Once I have those concepts clear, then I move to Aperture/Shutter. Is this a good approach?
My short term goal in photography is to replicate what I see with my eyes (in terms of colour accuracy, and detail). Nothing more, nothing less. My eyes don't see flash reflection off a dog, so I don't want it in my picture. My eyes don't see a blazing window, so I don't want it in my picture. This goal is harder to achieve than I thought. I now realize buying a SLR is like buying a Les Paul Guitar, just because it's a nice sounding piece doesn't mean you can play it.
Acadie Libre - Thanks for tip on editing software. I am currently using/learning GIMP. At this point, I'm not a big fan of post production. I'd like to learn to use the camera to it's (and my) limits before I get into post. Otherwise, I could get lazy and just take all my pictures in auto, then post produce to my needs. I don't want to use software to create/set/alter a mood that isn't/wasn't there to begin with. I want to find the mood and accurately capture it.
Sorry for the long winded post, but it's hard to help me if you don't know where I'm coming from. Also, no disrespect to anyone who is heavily into post. Just my personal preference.
Does this change the feedback Marko? Also, on wide shots with multiple people is there a rule of thumb as to focal point? Where would your focal point be on this shot? (Again with the window).