Results 1 to 9 of 9

Digital ISO

This is a discussion on Digital ISO within the Digital photography forums, part of the Photography & Fine art photography category; I am looking to finally leave 35mm and go Digital. I see that you can select the ISO for exposures. ...

Hybrid View

hawkinsws Digital ISO 03-24-2011, 07:19 AM
Iguanasan Yes, it does, sort of. In... 03-24-2011, 07:32 AM
hawkinsws Thanks for the feed back. I... 03-27-2011, 07:50 AM
Iguanasan Well, there are lots of... 03-27-2011, 08:18 AM
Gremlich To echo Iguanasan, with the... 03-27-2011, 11:15 AM
Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    hawkinsws is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    9
    My Photos
    Please ask before editing my photos

    Default Digital ISO

    I am looking to finally leave 35mm and go Digital. I see that you can select the ISO for exposures. In film higher ISO means larger grain. Does this translate to digital as well?

  2. #2
    Iguanasan's Avatar
    Iguanasan is offline Moderator
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Halifax, NS
    Posts
    10,917
    My Photos
    Please feel free to edit my photos
    Critiques
    Critique my photos anywhere in the forum

    Default

    Yes, it does, sort of. In digital, it translates to noise but a pixel is a pixel and the size of the pixels don't change. That being said, the newer, higher-end camera bodies are remarkably good at keeping the noise level down in amazingly high ISO settings. Here's some samples I found after a quick Google search: Samples - Canon EOS 7D High ISO Images | David's Simple Photography
    “If you are out there shooting, things will happen for you. If you’re not out there, you’ll only hear about it.” – Jay Maisel
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Feel free to edit my shots ONLY for use on this forum and critique my shots in ANY discussion area.
    Flickr | Blog | Google+

  3. #3
    hawkinsws is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    9
    My Photos
    Please ask before editing my photos

    Default

    Thanks for the feed back. I guess the follow up is basic 35mm zoom lenses were 28-80mm lenses. What I see now are 18-55 mm lenses is this equivalent? Thanks

  4. #4
    Iguanasan's Avatar
    Iguanasan is offline Moderator
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Halifax, NS
    Posts
    10,917
    My Photos
    Please feel free to edit my photos
    Critiques
    Critique my photos anywhere in the forum

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hawkinsws View Post
    Thanks for the feed back. I guess the follow up is basic 35mm zoom lenses were 28-80mm lenses. What I see now are 18-55 mm lenses is this equivalent? Thanks
    Well, there are lots of different lenses about but yes, in this case the kit lens has migrated to a 18-55mm. The general reason for this is that most of the digital sensors in the cameras were not the same size as a 35mm film. They are, in fact, called crop sensors and generally have a crop factor of about 1.6 or 1.7. What this means is that due to the size of the sensor the image is, for all intents and purposes, zoomed by a factor of 1.6 or 1.7. So, 18 * 1.6 = 28mm and 55 * 1.6 = 88mm which gives you about the same range.

    The exception to the rule, of course, is the full frame sensors that are now in many of the more expensive cameras.
    “If you are out there shooting, things will happen for you. If you’re not out there, you’ll only hear about it.” – Jay Maisel
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Feel free to edit my shots ONLY for use on this forum and critique my shots in ANY discussion area.
    Flickr | Blog | Google+

  5. #5
    Gremlich's Avatar
    Gremlich is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Maryland, USA
    Posts
    257
    My Photos
    Please ask before editing my photos
    Critiques
    Only critique photos posted in the critique forum

    Default

    To echo Iguanasan, with the cropped sensor (DX) like that found in the Nikon D90, a 35mm for example would be equivalent to about a 51mm on a 35mm film/full sensor (FX) digital. That's part of the reason I went with the Nikkor 35mm f/1.8, because I liked shooting with the Nikkor 50mm f/1.4 on my Nikon FM (I went with the f/1.8 for cost). I used a 135mm portrait with the FM, so, I'm thinking the 85mm will be the next lens I get for my D90 (which comes standard with the 18-105mm kit lens, which I really like).
    Buying a Nikon doesn't make you a photographer. It makes you a Nikon owner. ~Author Unknown

    500px
    My Deviantart pages
    My Flickr pages
    The Rogues

  6. #6
    hawkinsws is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    9
    My Photos
    Please ask before editing my photos

    Default

    Thank you for explaining.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36