Very neat technique. I would love to see it on flowers, still object.
Printable View
Very neat technique. I would love to see it on flowers, still object.
For me the first one is the best. I would stay away from the glamor glow.
I agree w/scorpio on this. Glamour glow for glamour shots and this is not glamour. The glow detracts from the 'creepiness' quality which helps make this shot imo.
I definitely like the original more. The glamour shot makes it look like you are trying to make it into something it's not.
The originals lighting kept me guessing on the light source. The glamour one makes it look less like an interesting experiment, and more like an accident. My guess of the light source was way off by the way :). I had pictured some kind of underwater lighting that shined upward through the water. Or light that was bouncing off of water. It felt as though she was sitting pool side or next to a lit fountain.
Cheers guys!