Which one do you prefer??
I used 1/400 second, but there was still some motion blur in the drops - how fast should I go next time?
This is a discussion on Water fountain - freeze frame within the Critiques forums, part of the Photography & Fine art photography category; Which one do you prefer?? I used 1/400 second, but there was still some motion blur in the drops - ...
Which one do you prefer??
I used 1/400 second, but there was still some motion blur in the drops - how fast should I go next time?
For me there is no question. I prefer #1 where you actually see the drops
I like the second one better ... hmm, experimentation will tell ... I'd try at least 1/500, if not 1/1000
~~ Beauty is in the eye of the beer holder ~~
best way to learn is to try
I'm thinking1/1000 - 1/2000 or faster for total freezeframe.
- Please connect with me further
Photo tours of Montreal - Private photography courses
- Join the new Photography.ca Facebook page
- Follow me on Twitter http://twitter.com/markokulik
- Follow me on Google+ https://plus.google.com/u/0/111159185852360398018/posts
- Check out the photography podcast
"You have to milk the cow quite a lot, and get plenty of milk to get a little cheese." Henri Cartier-Bresson from The Decisive Moment.
Shot 1 for me is the better composition but shot 2 has the better sharpness. Good captures![]()
good for you on this play. keep on trying with various shutter speeds and you will get what you like. I would recommend cloning out the bright pole on the right of the photo, it's conflicting with the subject
Feel free to make comments on any of my shots
my blog: http://bambesblog.blogspot.com/
My flickr photostream: http://www.flickr.com/photos/bambe1964/
A painter takes their vision and makes it a reality. A photographer takes reality and makes it their vision.
Thanks for your comments! I will try again in the near future...
Bookmarks