As shot\No post

[tegan]

As I indicated elsewhere here, HDR on buildings is most often unnecessary.
This photo was AS SHOT, from a fast moving car with NO postprocessing.

Tegan

[baddness]

from a fast moving car? Oh my Must've been a very fast shutter speed.
Awesome shot tegan, I really like it.

[tirediron]

Interesting; what combination of settings resulted in that unusual appearance?

[tegan]

Interesting; what combination of settings resulted in that unusual appearance?

1/320 sec. at f. 5, ISO 100, 27mm focal length
polarizing filter adjusted to maximum
dynamic range optimizer adjusted to maximum

Tegan

[Marko]

dynamic range optimizer adjusted to maximum

I really like this shot tegan and like it even more based on the conditions it was taken in.

But I'm guessing that it is the dynamic processer that is adding that extra something to the tones to the shot. If this is the case then I think it's a bit misleading to say "as shot" with no post processing...since others could not get that effect if they did not have the dynamic range optimizer.

Can you show us what the shot would have looked liked without this optimizer?

Thx!

M

[tegan]

I really like this shot tegan and like it even more based on the conditions it was taken in.

But I'm guessing that it is the dynamic processer that is adding that extra something to the tones to the shot. If this is the case then I think it's a bit misleading to say "as shot" with no post processing...since others could not get that effect if they did not have the dynamic range optimizer.

Can you show us what the shot would have looked liked without this optimizer?

Thx!

M

There is NO dynamic processor that adds anything to the tones of the shot.
It is a metering system that does selective calculations to areas of the photo against a brighter background and adjusts metering on the fly.

So, it is "as shot", despite what others have or don't have on their cameras. As a matter of fact wasn't someone previously differentiating between camera shooting and postprocessing as well as suggesting that all photography did not involve manipulation? Are camera features such as specialized metering now grouped in with post maniplation?

Tegan

[JoeMezz]

[QUOTE=tegan;4790]As I indicated elsewhere here, HDR on buildings is most often unnecessary.
This photo was AS SHOT, from a fast moving car with NO postprocessing.

Tegan
[QUOTE]

Tegan...

GREAT work. I really love it... thanks for posting

[tegan]

[QUOTE=JoeMezz;4859][QUOTE=tegan;4790]As I indicated elsewhere here, HDR on buildings is most often unnecessary.
This photo was AS SHOT, from a fast moving car with NO postprocessing.

Tegan

Tegan...

GREAT work. I really love it... thanks for posting

Thanks, Joe.

Tegan

[tomorrowstreasures]

Tegan, I did not take the time to read all of the other CC...
I love this shot! It is so sharp and steady! And to have it positioned so well in the frame w/o cropping, etc. Nice job!!!

[tegan]

Tegan, I did not take the time to read all of the other CC...
I love this shot! It is so sharp and steady! And to have it positioned so well in the frame w/o cropping, etc. Nice job!!!

Thanks, TT, considering it was taken from a fast moving car, I was happy that I had not forgotten my skills learned in photojournalist style shooting.

Tegan