Some have lens stabilization and others have body stabilization. Irrespective of the approach how slow can you shoot handheld without a tripod or monopod or bracing?
Tegan
This is a discussion on How good is your stabilization? within the Camera equipment & accessories forums, part of the Education & Technical category; Some have lens stabilization and others have body stabilization. Irrespective of the approach how slow can you shoot handheld without ...
Some have lens stabilization and others have body stabilization. Irrespective of the approach how slow can you shoot handheld without a tripod or monopod or bracing?
Tegan
"Photographic art requires the technical aspects of photography and the design aspects of art, both at an outstanding level."
what do you mean... with or without IS/VR?
doesn't it kinda depend on your focal length too?
______________________
Nikon D300, Nikkor 24-70 2.8 . Nikkor 70-200 2.8 . Nikkor 50mm 1.8 . Sigma 105mm 2.8 . Tokina 12-24 4 . SB-600 . 2xVivitar 285
never mind.. misunderstood..
i've shot 1/3 with VRII with 2 outta 5 being very good...
______________________
Nikon D300, Nikkor 24-70 2.8 . Nikkor 70-200 2.8 . Nikkor 50mm 1.8 . Sigma 105mm 2.8 . Tokina 12-24 4 . SB-600 . 2xVivitar 285
I am a wiggler. and a heavy breather and have no stabilizer either built in to me or the camera. sigh. i am a wanna be steady person though!
I routinely shoot hand-held down to 1/30, and have shot as low as 1/8 (with lots of body bracing), but as a matter of course, I always try and use a tripod below 1/60 if possible, or with big glass.
I have shot down to 1/4 of a second with good results, handheld with no bracing but I do not like to go below an 1/8 of a second. On film I once successfully shot at 1/8 of a second handheld for a 16" by 20" blow-up.
Tegan
"Photographic art requires the technical aspects of photography and the design aspects of art, both at an outstanding level."
Bookmarks