Before and after

[Greg_Nuspel]

Guess which is which

[zenon5940]

Nice pics. I would say the top photo is the "after" because of the two cameras installed. Unless they removed the cameras ... If they did, the "after" would be the bottom one but they sure did a very good job at hiding all traces of the cameras.

[Greg_Nuspel]

I guess I'm becoming a clone fan. I wanted to see what people thought of my removal of the cameras in PS.

[Bambi]

well it's too late but I thought the one without the cameras was 'after' :)

nice photos

[Iguanasan]

Cool! #2 was my guess too but not because of the cameras (nice re-touching!). The colour seemed better in the second one which was why it was my guess.

Nice capture and great editing!

[AntZ]

Cool! #2 was my guess too but not because of the cameras (nice re-touching!). The colour seemed better in the second one which was why it was my guess.

Nice capture and great editing!

I guessed #2 too because of the colour. Totally missed the cameras too. Nice work on that.

[Mad Aussie]

I was also leaning toward the 2nd shot being the 'after' because of the lack of camera's (how the hell could you miss those Antz???) and the colour difference in the reflections.

However, I was sceptically looking very closely finding it hard to believe you'd achieved such a great job of cloning them out.

VERY well done!!

[zenon5940]

You really had me fooled there Greg. It never crossed my mind that the removal could have been "PP". Good show !

[Greg_Nuspel]

The camera on the right was the worst to do since much of the window edge was gone.

[Michaelaw]

:) I totally missed the cameras too and guessed #2 because the colors were better. Did you ever go out and just focus on how many freakin cameras there are? And I can't see two in a still photo :D:D:D

PS...Very cool cloning work...Good job!

[Mad Aussie]

It's amazing to me that the cameras weren't immediately obvious to anyone looking at the first photo.

If the question had been "What are the two biggest distractions in this photo?" I bet you'd have seen them right away!

[Iguanasan]

Honestly, I too didn't notice them on first blush. I was busy checking out the reflection and not looking too closely at the actual building.

[Marko]

VERY nice cloning work and that second shot sings SO much louder than the original :highfive:

[Mad Aussie]

Honestly, I too didn't notice them on first blush. I was busy checking out the reflection and not looking too closely at the actual building.
So if a hot chick with a hot dress on walked by, you'd notice the colour of the dress and nothing else huh?? :headslap:

[JAS_Photo]

Great job on the post work! I did not see the cameras at first either!

[Mad Aussie]

Great job on the post work! I did not see the cameras at first either!
Ok ok ... I see what's happening here ... Canadians have an eye deficiency!! :rolleyes:

No wait ... AntZ didn't see them either :cool: Damn ... thought I had there for a sec :headslap:

[Iguanasan]

So if a hot chick with a hot dress on walked by, you'd notice the colour of the dress and nothing else huh?? :headslap:

I am easily distracted by things that catch my eye, however, it's all in the subject. I would probably be able to tell you what the "hot chick" looked like but I wouldn't have a clue what the dress looked like or even what colour it was. You see, I do have my priorities ;)

[Greg_Nuspel]

I am easily distracted by things that catch my eye, however, it's all in the subject. I would probably be able to tell you what the "hot chick" looked like but I wouldn't have a clue what the dress looked like or even what colour it was. You see, I do have my priorities ;)

You mean she was wearing a dress :evil2:

[tomorrowstreasures]

you did a bang up job of removing those cameras!!! :highfive:

[Michaelaw]

What cameras?