constructive criticism please

[ocular]

Hey guys, I'm looking for constructive criticism . I've published a new site www.srfotos.com . The site design is not my own ( I bought it off flashden ) So please let me know what you think of the pictures and if any don't go well together. I've found the site runs best on firefox.

[casil403]

I like your photos on the site that I did see, but for me personally (because of a head injury I sustained last year), I can't look at the rapid moving subject images on the home page because the movement gives me vertigo/balance/dizziness issues.
Sorry I couldn't be more constructively helpful :confused:

[kat]

I think it's a neat layout but I really couldn't get through it too well. My interent speed is fairly..slow.

With what I was able to see in my little time I have right now..you have some very lovely images (winter selection!)

[ocular]

Thanks for the comments. I was thinking getting rid of much of the flash.

[jmayoff]

I like it. I'm not real big on flash sites, but I like yours. It's fast-loading on my connection and it looks nice. I also like the way the pictures show up very large, almost taking up the full browser window.

I didn't look at ALL your pictures, but the ones I did look at were really spectacular. I like your dark style.

[Marko]

I'll be honest, I'm not crazy about the flash and the layout at all.
Every image took between 5-8 seconds to load. There's no info about any of the images (title, date, more precise location, etc.)

In terms of the actual images, quite a few nice ones for sure. My fave is your profile pic - EXTREMELY beautiful image.
Hope that helps - Marko

[ocular]

I like it. I'm not real big on flash sites, but I like yours. It's fast-loading on my connection and it looks nice. I also like the way the pictures show up very large, almost taking up the full browser window.

I didn't look at ALL your pictures, but the ones I did look at were really spectacular. I like your dark style.

Thanks.


I'll be honest, I'm not crazy about the flash and the layout at all.
Every image took between 5-8 seconds to load. There's no info about any of the images (title, date, more precise location, etc.)

In terms of the actual images, quite a few nice ones for sure. My fave is your profile pic - EXTREMELY beautiful image.
Hope that helps - Marko

Thanks. There are titles, if you click on the image itself; but yeh I'm gonna have to involve more basic html n text ;p

[Michaelaw]

I really like some of your images but the loading times are not acceptable. I'm wondering perhaps if the size of your images is the culprit here? I look forward to when you get it sorted out so I can see more of your work with better loading times :fingerscr